Do you see a void in LinkedIn’s operating model?

I feel the real issue lies in understanding the purpose and USP of each platform, and that responsibility sits with both the platform and the content creator. Every platform is built with a certain intent. When the relevance standard slips, content starts to feel out of place. For example, LinkedIn is meant for professional conversations and insights, so naturally people expect content that aligns with that mindset.

If creators pause to ask, “Does this belong here?”, a lot of the dilution can be avoided. It’s less about restricting expression and more about respecting the space and the audience it was created for. When that shared understanding exists, platforms can actually deliver on the value they promise, and meaningful content gets the attention it deserves.

I think it’s more about the ever elusive algorithms & people trying to decode it just to see it change again. Also, new creators & social media enthusiasts may want to try cross platform strategy to know where their audience is.

I think the deeper question is, how do you avoid what Cory Doctorow has termed "enshittification" in these platforms? Worthwhile reading his essay (which he has turned into a book):

https://pluralistic.net/2023/01/21/potemkin-ai/#hey-guys